Stephen King testifies in books for government merger process

WASHINGTON (AP) – Stephen King did not take legal action on the stand Tuesday when he testified against his own publisher’s efforts to merge with Penguin Random House.

WASHINGTON (AP) – Stephen King did not take legal action on the stand Tuesday when he testified against his own publisher’s efforts to merge with Penguin Random House. But he knew how to please a crowd and even get the judge to thank him for his time.

“It was a real pleasure to hear your testimony,” otherwise no-nonsense US District Judge Florence J. Pan told the author after he finished speaking as a government witness in a federal antitrust case against the Penguin Random House-Simon & Schuster merger. King’s longtime publisher.

The 74-year-old King had a haunting but gregarious appearance, his gaunt features accented by his gray suit and sneakers, and his timid gait, as he had been since he was hit by a van and seriously injured in 1999. But once sworn in, he was laid back and liked to talk and was always alert on how to tell a story,

“My name is Stephen King. I’m a freelance writer,” King said when asked to identify himself. The Justice Department is trying to convince Pan that the proposed combination of Penguin Random House and Simon & Schuster, two of the world’s largest publishers, would stifle competition and hurt the careers of some of the world’s most popular authors — a status King like few others holds .

King’s remarkable career, with so many bestsellers that he could only give an estimate, has come amid waves of industry consolidation. As he noted in his remarks, when his seminal novel Carrie came out in 1974, there were dozens of publishers in New York, and he has seen many of them either acquired by larger corporations or put out of business.

Today, New York’s publishing industry is often a story of the so-called Big Five: Penguin Random House, Simon & Schuster, HarperCollins Publishing, Hachette Book Group, and Macmillan. Carrie’s publisher, Doubleday, is now part of Penguin Random House. So did another former King publisher, Viking Press.

During the first two days, the lawyers from both sides presented remarkably contrasting views on the book industry. The Justice Department sees an increasingly limited market for bestsellers, with the Big Five dominating. Penguin Random House sees book publishing as dynamic and open to many, with limited impact from the proposed merger.

King’s appearance before the US District Court in Washington – highly unusual for an antitrust case – set a narrative about the evolution of book publishing towards the dominance of the Big Five companies. As prosecutor Mel Schwarz guided King through his story, beginning as a new unknown author in the 1970s, and his relationships with agents and publishers, King focused on a critique of the industry as it is today.

King answered Schwarz’s questions sharply, with a few moments of humor and brief beginnings of mild outrage, as he testified on day two of the trial, which is expected to last two to three weeks.

“The Big Five are pretty entrenched,” he said.

When questioned later, Jonathan Karp, CEO of Simon & Schuster, described a world of highly competitive bidding among publishers – including between his firm and Penguin Random House – for author’s works, sometimes exceeding each other by millions of dollars for high-profile authors.

With his potential future boss, Penguin Random House Markus Dohle, among the courtroom onlookers, Karp dismissed the “Big Five” moniker, calling it “ecclesiastical and ethnocentric.”

“I think there are a lot of good publishers across the country. It’s not just about us,” Karp said.

As an example, he said that nearly 100-year-old Simon & Schuster has recently faced more aggressive competition from Amazon’s book publishing business.

But Justice Department attorney Jeff Vernon brought up a message Karp sent to John Irving, his favorite author, saying he didn’t think the government would allow Simon & Schuster and Penguin Random House to merge. “That assumes we still have a Justice Department,” Karp wrote in the message.

At one point, the judge appeared to support a key government argument — that greater concentration in the industry could reduce the compensation paid to authors. After two days of testimony, Pan said, “One feels that competition increases the level of advances” and less competition decreases them.

King’s displeasure with the proposed merger prompted him to volunteer to testify for the government.

“I came because I think consolidation is bad for competition,” King said. As the industry evolves, he said, “it’s becoming increasingly difficult for writers to find money to live on.”

King expressed skepticism about the two publishers’ commitment to continue bidding separately and competitively on books after a merger.

“You might as well say you’re going to have a husband and wife bidding against each other for the same house,” he joked. ‘” he said, gesturing with a polite arm movement.

King’s was entertaining and informative, although he had little specific to say about how the merger could hurt best-selling authors, with the government’s case focusing on those receiving advances of $250,000 or more. Attorney Daniel Petrocelli, representing the publishers, told King he had no questions for him and declined cross-examination. Instead, he hoped they could have coffee together sometime.

Long a crowd pleaser, King spoke warmly on Tuesday about “living the dream” of paying all the bills while working on something he loves. But the author of “The Stand,” “The Shining,” and many others wonders who else could have the chances they did. He was chosen by the government not just for his fame, but for his public criticism of the $2.2 billion deal announced in late 2021, which potentially constitutes what rival Hachette Book Group CEO Michael Pietsch called ” gigantic prominent” company.

“As publishers consolidate, it becomes harder for indie publishers to survive,” King tweeted last year.

King’s affinity with smaller publishers is personal. While continuing to publish with the Simon & Schuster imprint Scribner, he has written thrillers for the independent Hard Case Crime. Years ago, the publisher asked him to contribute a blurb, but King instead offered to write a novel for them, The Colorado Kid, which was published in 2005. He’s also written novels for other small businesses and said some of his work doesn’t have the kind of commercial power the Big Five would expect.

King himself would likely benefit from the Penguin Random House-Simon & Schuster deal, but he’s had priorities other than his material well-being in the past. He has long been a critic of tax cuts for the rich, although “the rich” certainly includes Stephen King, and openly calls on the government to raise its taxes.

“In America, we should all have to pay our fair share,” he wrote for The Daily Beast in 2012.

Hillel Italie and Marcy Gordon, The Associated Press











Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.